"The Pulse of Canada "

Please Give Stumble a Thumbs Up!


Occupying Homelessness?

Posted April 9, 2014 by Stephen Elliott-Buckley

Clearly, I’m no brain surgeon. But if there are homeless people, a civilized culture would find a way to use a progressive tax system to house them. Simple. Homelessness, however, is a magnet for reprobate poor bashers who are too greedy to part with their wealth [massive or otherwise] to solve a problem. But guess what. […]

People who read this page, also read:

Full Story »


Ya can’t fix stupid!

Posted March 25, 2014 by Allan W Janssen

Folks, I would like to show an article here that I think exemplifies what is wrong with a lot of people in general! Here is a guy who was dead set against GMO’s (genetically modified foods) the same as some people are bent out of shape about fluoridation of water, immunization shots, climate change, nuclear […]

Full Story »


Metabolically Healthy Obesity and the Risk of Type 2 Diabetes

Posted March 25, 2014 by Yoni Freedhoff

The term “metabolically healthy obesity” is generally thought to describe excess weight in individuals who don’t have any weight-relatable medical conditions. When discussing whether or not these individuals should be counselled to lose weight many point to their potential risk of developing weight-relatable conditions as a reason to do so, and truly, that makes good sense, though looking at the data from my friend and colleague Arya Sharma, it would appear that truly metabolically healthy obesity carries virtually no excess mortality risk – at least not over the 16 years of NHANES data they studied. In Arya’s work (graph from same up above) those individuals who are at no risk are staged as EOSS zero – which means that they truly had no discernible weight relatable issues whatsoever – they indeed had metabolically healthy obesity.

So how then to explain the outcomes from a paper published yesterday in Obesity Reviews? The paper, Metabolically healthy obesity and risk of incident type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies, was a meta-analysis using data from the English Longitudinal Study of Aging and it concluded that those with what they defined as “metabolically healthy obesity” had a 4 fold higher risk of developing type 2 diabetes over a 6 year period than individuals with “metabolically healthy normal weight”. The authors then conclude,

Prospective evidence does not indicate that healthy obesity is a harmless condition.

But before you agree with them there’s something important you need to know. Whereas Arya (rightly as far as I’m concerned) defines metabolically healthy obesity (EOSS 0) as an individual who has ZERO weight-relatable conditions, the authors here considered a person to have “metabolically healthy obesity” even if they had one of the following issues: hypertension, impaired glycaemic control, systemic inflammation, adverse high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or adverse triglycerides.

Rather disingenuous don’t you think, to describe the increased relative risk of developing type 2 diabetes in individuals who are most assuredly not metabolically healthy as purely consequent to their weight?

Regardless of your weight, if you have hypertension, impaired glycaemic control, systemic inflammation, adverse high-density lipoprotein cholesterol or adverse triglycerides then you are not metabolically healthy, and studies that explicitly suggest otherwise aren’t doing anyone any favours, nor answering any questions about risks in those with truly metabolically healthy obesity.

Full Story »

The Latest