Canadian Blogs



Wild parsnip in ditches and herbicides

Posted June 25, 2015 by Jennifer A. Jilks

Wild parsnip

I’ve written about the Wild parsnip in our ditches. The plants grow for two years, producing flowers and seeds in the second year. It was across the highway, in the ditch, and the seeds have both blown into our ditch, and birds…

Full Story »


Eat Your Veggies and Proteins Before You Eat Your Carbs

Posted June 25, 2015 by Yoni Freedhoff
Was Pink Floyd onto something?

Very cool, very small, very preliminary study.

Those qualifiers out of the way, the study, published in this month’s Diabetes Care, looked at the impact of order of food ingestion on post-meal glucose levels, in 11 adults with type 2 diabetes who were taking metformin. The subjects, after a 12 hour fast, were offered two meals spaced one week apart. The meals included carbs – ciabatta bread and orange juice, protein – skinless grilled chicken breast, and vegetables – lettuce and tomato salad with low-fat Italian vinaigrette and steamed broccoli with butter. What differed was when they ate the carbs. One week it was first, the next, last. Post-meal glucose levels were measured at 30, 60 and 120 minutes.

Though the study definitely left me scratching my head as to why the diabetic patients were given juice with their meals at all, results wise, when protein and veggies were consumed before a meal’s carbs, post meal glucose and insulin levels were markedly lower!

And though indeed this is a very small study, given the incredible ease of the intervention, and with no obvious downside or hardship attached, it may well be worth considering the order of your meals’ foods if diabetes or impaired glucose tolerance is a concern.

Full Story »


Wood ducks have flown the coop

Posted June 21, 2015 by Jennifer A. Jilks

Mama duck did a good job. Only two eggs left. We think we counted 17 or so.

Data entry

They hatched yesterday, gone today! NOTHING on the trailcam! They are fast. Faster than 5 seconds…

Wood ducks #2 hatched from Jennifer Jilks on Vimeo.
At gre…

Full Story »


A Large Swath of Nutrition Research is Based On Lies

Posted June 9, 2015 by Yoni Freedhoff
A Sample Completed Memory Based Dietary Assessment (Not Mine)

Well maybe “lies” is too strong a word as not all of the omissions are wilful, but the fact of the matter is, as a whole, we’re nearly useless at memory-based dietary assessments, and yet they serve as the underpinning of a tremendous amount of dietary research which in turn is used to craft public health policy and dietary recommendations.

In a paper published today in Mayo Clinic Proceedings, Edward Archer and colleagues thoroughly review the futility of memory-based dietary assessments, and while I don’t share Archer’s overarching belief that the bulk of obesity is explicable on the basis of maternal obesity’s impact on developing fetuses, or his contrarian viewpoint that diet is not a major risk factor for disease, his paper does an admirable job of destroying the notion that 24-hour dietary recalls and food frequency questionnaires (FFQs) are useful.

Before getting to the meat of the paper, back to Archer’s assertion that diet is not a major risk factor for disease. To illustrate that point Archer notes,

This hypothesis is supported by multiple lines of evidence, such as a 40% decline in the age-adjusted mortality rate from 1969 to 2010, a progressive decades long reduction in age-adjusted cardiovascular disease incidence and mortality, and a 1.5% per annum reduction in age adjusted mortality rates from all major cancers as well as significant reductions in lung cancer incidence in men and women between 2001 and 2010.

Given that cigarette smoking has decreased dramatically in that same time period (see graph below),

and the fact that smoking is America’s number one cause of death and lung cancer, and is a major cause of cardiovascular disease, that rather than point to smoking cessation as the improvements’ probable cause, he instead suggests, absent of any pathophysiological explanation or hypothetical mechanism, that the standard American diet is responsible for the observed decrease in death and lung cancer, is plainly bizarre. All the more so when considering the impact the introduction of Westernized diets have been seen to have on non-communicable disease risks in populations the world over.

That aside (and truly, I wish it weren’t part of the paper as it detracts from its impact), the paper’s a worthwhile read. With an expansive review of the literature, Archer explains not only how far off the mark dietary recall is (up to 80% of some recall studies include dietary patterns that are “physiologically implausible“), but why, covering studies that explain how,

24hr and food frequency questionnaires can be most accurately defined as mere attributions based on mental experiences that are strongly influenced by the respondents’ idiosyncratic qualities (ie, education), previous memories and information, knowledge and beliefs, motives, goals, habitual behavior, and the social context in which the memories are encoded or reported.”

He also asserts that the design of memory based dietary assessments itself inspires false reporting and posits that,

it is not a question of whether FFQs induce false reporting, but to what extent“.

Finally Archer discusses the criteria for scientific research and he suggests that memory based dietary assessments are,

akin to creation science in that they fail to meet the basic requirements of scientific research

in that they are not independently observable or measurable (reporting you’ve eaten an apple, and how much of that apple you ate, isn’t the same as having your apple eating independently observed and the amount of apple you consumed measured), they are easily and regularly falsified, they lack validity, and they are unreliable. This leads Archer to call the discipline of nutrition epidemiology “pseudoscience“, stating that,

when a person provides a dietary report, the data collected are not actual food or beverage consumption, but rather an error prone and highly edited anecdote regarding memories of food and beverage consumption

and hence,

do not meet the basic requirements of the scientific method and, by definition, are pseudoscientific when presented as actual estimates of energy or nutrient consumption.

Notwithstanding the non-evidence based ease with which Archer dismisses the potential impact of diet on health, this paper soundly illustrates the need for the rapid development and adoption of an objective means to track dietary choices – something the technologies of today are well suited to provide.

Full Story »


5 Reasons why you should regularly attend your product’s training classes

Posted April 6, 2015 by Anonymous

by Saeed Khan If you work on a product that requires a training class, your product is way too complex!!! OK, just kidding.   If you work in the B2B space, it’s almost guaranteed that there is a training requirement for your product. The training may be delivered face-to-face in a classroom setting, or over the […]

Full Story »


Study Finds Teens Are Less Reliant On Social Networks

Posted January 6, 2015 by Anonymous

Social networks, the term has come to mean more than one thing in our society. And this particular study can really throw you for a loop if you focus on what most of us now think of when we say […]

Full Story »

The Latest