A new poll from the Pew Research Center tells us, predictably enough, that Americans generally…
Lots of people try to reduce sugar, and of those who succeed, I’ll regularly hear them tell me that after a little while, they no longer miss it. But are they not missing it much because their taste buds “change“, or do they not miss it because of the psychological sunk costs of their personal investment into a low sugar diet?
Well that’s what a recent PepsiCo study sort of set out to explore. Briefly, researchers randomized a small group of matched individuals to consume either a low-sugar, artificial sweetener free diet (40% reduction in simple sugars and total ban on artificial sweeteners), or a regular one for 3 months time after which they were told to consume whatever they wanted for the final month of the study. Participants tracked food by way of food diary, and given the nature of the experiment, clearly they weren’t blinded to their study condition, and nor were the researchers. Each month of the study, participants were asked to rate the perceived sweetness of vanilla puddings and raspberry flavoured sweet drinks.
By month three the sugar and sweetener reduced folks were rating the pudding as 40% sweeter than the control diet group. They did not however rate it as any less (or more) delicious. There was also no change in their weight compared with the normal diet folks.
This was a small study, but that said, its findings aren’t particularly heartening. If foods perceived as sweeter by those who have reduced their sugar intake are not also perceived as less enjoyable, the swap to a low-sugar diet won’t be self-reinforcing and hence will be more prone to failing in the long term, and the fact that weight didn’t change speaks to the notion that simply removing sugar from your diet isn’t likely to be the weight-loss panacea some bill it to be. If only it were that simple.
A little while ago I came across coverage and commentary about this article about the future possibility of pills that might in theory be able to replace exercise.
Predictably, the chorus of voices that rose up were full of indignation with sentiments that ultimately suggested that even if found to be incredibly effective, exercise pills would be the bastion of the lazy.
Is it lazy to want to improve your quality and quantity of life? Because that’s what these pills would do if they did in fact provide people with the benefits of exercise. And yes, sure, it’d be lovely if everyone had the very real luxuries of possessing the health, time, money, and inclination to regularly and genuinely exercise, but except in the minds of those filled with I can do it and so should you lifestyle sanctimony, that’s simply not the case for a large percentage of our real life population.
by Saeed Khan If you work on a product that requires a training class, your product is way too complex!!! OK, just kidding. If you work in the B2B space, it’s almost guaranteed that there is a training requirement for your product. The training may be delivered face-to-face in a classroom setting, or over the […]
Social networks, the term has come to mean more than one thing in our society. And this particular study can really throw you for a loop if you focus on what most of us now think of when we say […]