BlogsCanada.ca
"The Pulse of Canada "

 
 

 
General

Adicto a la inclusión

Posted June 16, 2013 by Guillermo

Hace unos meses me pidieron de un sitio web de Montreal que les colabore con mis notas. Acordamos una entrada por mes a publicarse el primer jueves de cada uno. La entrada que sigue es la que les enviara a fines de mayo con la esperanza que fuera ubicada el Jueves 6 de Junio. Por [...]

Full Story »

image
Crime

Friday Already?

Posted June 14, 2013 by Allan W Janssen

Dear Readers: It’s not nice to fool Mother Nature, and it’s also stupid to screw around with Insurance Companies! VANCOUVER – British Columbia’s Crown auto insurer has filed a civil claim against 46 people who have been charged or convicted for taking part in the Stanley Cup riot in Vancouver two years ago. The Insurance [...]

Full Story »

 
General

The Quebec turban ban: What doesn’t get said

Posted June 12, 2013 by Paul Wells

Paul Wells on multiculturalism and separation of church and state

Full Story »

hi-marois-8col
Commentary

Mid-Week Mayhem!

Posted June 12, 2013 by Allan W Janssen

Well folks, here is another debate where the French tell the rest of Canada to go pound salt! (I have included the entire article here so you can see the crap being thrown around in all its glory!) The Canadian Press Pauline Marois came out kicking in defence of the Quebec Soccer Federation’s refusal to [...]

Full Story »

 
General

On soccer and turbans: stand by for the humiliation card

Posted June 11, 2013 by Ted Bird

The Canadian Soccer Association’s decision to suspend Quebec for rebuffing a directive to lift a ban on turbans in youth soccer is an overdue shot across the bow of intolerance and xenophobia, and you don’t need a degree in political science to recogni…

Full Story »

 
Alberta

UN Unveil Summer Tour Dates

Posted June 10, 2013 by Andrew_Horan

Montreal Electro-punk-dance-pop duo UN have announced the dates of their summer tour. Kara Keith and Jen Reimer is also offering a free stream of their debut album UN Titled. Check ‘em out on the following dates; Friday, June 14th, 10pm - Sneaky Dee’s (M for Montreal showcase) @ NXNE, Toronto Friday, June 21st, 6pm - Alexandria Centre @ [...]

Full Story »

 
General

Investigation into Quebec protests begins

Posted June 4, 2013 by The Canadian Press

Student groups, police unions boycott hearings

Full Story »

 
Activism

The Canadian Progressive: Thousands demand Lone Pine drop its NAFTA lawsuit

Posted June 3, 2013 by Guest Blog

By: Council of Canadians | Press Release

OTTAWA – Two weeks after the launch of a public petition, organizers have received over 3,000 signatures demanding that energy company Lone Pine Resources drop its $250 million NAFTA (North America Free Trade Agreement) lawsuit against Canada for Québec’s moratorium on fracking.

The petition sponsors—the Council of Canadians, the Réseau québécois sur l’Intégration continentale (RQIC), Sierra Club US, FLOW (For Love of Water), Eau Secours! and AmiEs de la Terre—sent three letters to Lone Pine today, each signed by 1,000 people, and will continue to collect signatures until the company agrees to (Read more…)

Full Story »

 
General

PEF Keynote: Neoliberalism in Quebec

Posted June 3, 2013 by Erin Weir

The PEF marked our 15th anniversary at last weekend’s Canadian Economics Association conference in Montreal. Guillaume Hébert from the Institut de Recherche et d’Informations Socio-économiques (IRIS) delivered the following keynote address. Thanks very much to Mathieu Dufour for translating it into English. **** Thank you very much for inviting me to give this keynote address. [...]

Full Story »

 
Alberta

XUL Unveil Tour Dates

Posted May 30, 2013 by Andrew_Horan

Vernon, BC black metal band XUL have unveiled the dates of their upcoming cross-Canada tour. The band is currently offering a free stream of their 2012 debut album Malignance, give it a listen here. It’s also available for PWYC. They’re currently worki…

Full Story »

 
General

Earnings Up, But Employment Down

Posted May 29, 2013 by Erin Weir

Today’s payroll figures indicate that, while average weekly earnings rose, the number of employees on Canadian payrolls declined by 22,100 in March. This decline was concentrated in Quebec, where payroll employment fell by 20,900. Ontario also suffered a decline of 9,200, which was partly offset by gains of 3,300 in Manitoba and 1,900 in Nova [...]

Full Story »

 
General

The Mulcair Envelope: Questions that will haunt the NDP Leader

Posted May 22, 2013 by CuriosityCat
The Mulcair envelope issues

Ottawa is aswirl with rumours about breaches of ethical rules by our esteemed senators, and a subcurrent is now starting, egged on by a desperate Conservative Party that wishes to change the channel and/or deflect criticism.

Three interesting articles by journalists deal with the possible cash bribe that was offered to Thomas Mulcair, the rookie member of the Quebec legislature, some 17 years ago, by a former Laval mayor now charged with corruption (including gangsterism).
Apart from the fact that the apparently conflicting statements by Thomas Mulcair will be used in thousands of TV attack ads by  Harper’s neocon new Conservatives leading up to the next election, there are a few questions that Mulcair needs to consider while he decides how to handle this issue.
 
Thomas Mulcair


The 4 questions that have arisen so far are:

1.      Did Mulcair know that the white envelope offered to him by the Mayor contained a cash bribe?
2.     If he did not know that it contained cash, did he at the time of the offer suspect that it contained cash and was meant as a bribe?
3.     If he did so suspect, why did he not report it to the authorities at the time?
4.     Why, in 2010, did he apparently accuse another rookie member, who was also offered an envelope by the same mayor, of failing to report the offer to the authorities (even though Mulcair did not report the offer made to him)?
The first 2 questions are designed to clear up what seem to be conflicting facts in press reports. The third question deals with Mulcair’s non-reporting of the incident for many years.
The last question raises the issue of possible hypocrisy by Mulcair (the pot calling the kettle black).
In Thursday’s Globe & Mail, Daniel Leblanc writes about the offer to Mulcair (my underlining and bolding):
Federal NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair refused an envelope that may have contained cash from the mayor of Laval, Que., in 1994 but discussed the matter with law-enforcement authorities only 17 years later.

The incident raises questions about the delay of the disclosure until 2011 but also Mr. Mulcair’s statement the previous year to reporters that he never saw envelopes of cash in the office of long-time Laval mayor Gilles Vaillancourt..
Mr. Mulcair acknowledged in a statement on Thursday that he met with Mr. Vaillancourt the year he was first elected as an MNA but that he discussed the meeting with authorities only two years ago.
“In early 2011, I met with the police in order to help in their investigation. I gave to them my account of a meeting I had with Mayor Gilles Vaillancourt dating back to 1994. As is indicated, I effectively and immediately ended the meeting with Mr. Vaillancourt,” Mr. Mulcair said.
The statement corroborated a story in Montreal newspaper La Presse that Mr. Mulcair told police that he felt the envelope likely contained cash and that he had refused it.
Further on, Leblanc writes:
Mr. Mulcair was asked at a news conference in 2010 whether he had ever been offered or seen “envelopes of cash” in Mr. Vaillancourt’s office. He answered, “No.”

 The statement is accurate in that Mr. Mulcair apparently did not see the contents of the envelope that Mr. Vaillancourt had offered.
Leblanc writes this about Mulcair’s concern about another member of the legislature:
In his 2010 comments, Mr. Mulcair criticized Serge Ménard, a former Bloc Québécois MP and Parti Québécois MNA who had acknowledged to the media that he was offered an envelope from Mr. Vaillancourt.

 While Mr. Ménard said he refused the offer, Mr. Mulcair raised questions about his failure to report the matter to authorities, given that he went on to become a prominent PQ minister.
“One thing preoccupies me with that is that a person who went on to become justice minister and public security minister felt that he couldn’t do anything about it,” Mr. Mulcair said at the time.
He added that when someone raised a case of potential wrongdoing with him, “I invited the person to go to the police.”
It is not clear from the above quote as to exactly when, in Mulcair’s opinion, his fellow legislature member should have told the police about the mayor and the envelope. Should he have done it soon after the envelope was offered by the mayor? If so, why would this duty not also apply to Mulcair? Or should he have done it as soon as he was appointed justice minister? And why just then?

This issue will not go away in a hurry, and the Harper Tory attack ads will hurt Mulcair and his party unless he clarifies issues, especially the nagging question why he never told any authority (the Speaker of the Legislature; the RCMP; the provincial police; the Premier; whoever …) about his concerns about ‘the envelope’.

Full Story »

 
General

The Mulcair Envelope: Questions that will haunt the NDP Leader

Posted May 22, 2013 by CuriosityCat
The Mulcair envelope issues

Ottawa is aswirl with rumours about breaches of ethical rules by our esteemed senators, and a subcurrent is now starting, egged on by a desperate Conservative Party that wishes to change the channel and/or deflect criticism.

Three interesting articles by journalists deal with the possible cash bribe that was offered to Thomas Mulcair, the rookie member of the Quebec legislature, some 17 years ago, by a former Laval mayor now charged with corruption (including gangsterism).
Apart from the fact that the apparently conflicting statements by Thomas Mulcair will be used in thousands of TV attack ads by  Harper’s neocon new Conservatives leading up to the next election, there are a few questions that Mulcair needs to consider while he decides how to handle this issue.
 
Thomas Mulcair


The 4 questions that have arisen so far are:

1.      Did Mulcair know that the white envelope offered to him by the Mayor contained a cash bribe?
2.     If he did not know that it contained cash, did he at the time of the offer suspect that it contained cash and was meant as a bribe?
3.     If he did so suspect, why did he not report it to the authorities at the time?
4.     Why, in 2010, did he apparently accuse another rookie member, who was also offered an envelope by the same mayor, of failing to report the offer to the authorities (even though Mulcair did not report the offer made to him)?
The first 2 questions are designed to clear up what seem to be conflicting facts in press reports. The third question deals with Mulcair’s non-reporting of the incident for many years.
The last question raises the issue of possible hypocrisy by Mulcair (the pot calling the kettle black).
In Thursday’s Globe & Mail, Daniel Leblanc writes about the offer to Mulcair (my underlining and bolding):
Federal NDP Leader Thomas Mulcair refused an envelope that may have contained cash from the mayor of Laval, Que., in 1994 but discussed the matter with law-enforcement authorities only 17 years later.

The incident raises questions about the delay of the disclosure until 2011 but also Mr. Mulcair’s statement the previous year to reporters that he never saw envelopes of cash in the office of long-time Laval mayor Gilles Vaillancourt..
Mr. Mulcair acknowledged in a statement on Thursday that he met with Mr. Vaillancourt the year he was first elected as an MNA but that he discussed the meeting with authorities only two years ago.
“In early 2011, I met with the police in order to help in their investigation. I gave to them my account of a meeting I had with Mayor Gilles Vaillancourt dating back to 1994. As is indicated, I effectively and immediately ended the meeting with Mr. Vaillancourt,” Mr. Mulcair said.
The statement corroborated a story in Montreal newspaper La Presse that Mr. Mulcair told police that he felt the envelope likely contained cash and that he had refused it.
Further on, Leblanc writes:
Mr. Mulcair was asked at a news conference in 2010 whether he had ever been offered or seen “envelopes of cash” in Mr. Vaillancourt’s office. He answered, “No.”

 The statement is accurate in that Mr. Mulcair apparently did not see the contents of the envelope that Mr. Vaillancourt had offered.
Leblanc writes this about Mulcair’s concern about another member of the legislature:
In his 2010 comments, Mr. Mulcair criticized Serge Ménard, a former Bloc Québécois MP and Parti Québécois MNA who had acknowledged to the media that he was offered an envelope from Mr. Vaillancourt.

 While Mr. Ménard said he refused the offer, Mr. Mulcair raised questions about his failure to report the matter to authorities, given that he went on to become a prominent PQ minister.
“One thing preoccupies me with that is that a person who went on to become justice minister and public security minister felt that he couldn’t do anything about it,” Mr. Mulcair said at the time.
He added that when someone raised a case of potential wrongdoing with him, “I invited the person to go to the police.”
It is not clear from the above quote as to exactly when, in Mulcair’s opinion, his fellow legislature member should have told the police about the mayor and the envelope. Should he have done it soon after the envelope was offered by the mayor? If so, why would this duty not also apply to Mulcair? Or should he have done it as soon as he was appointed justice minister? And why just then?

This issue will not go away in a hurry, and the Harper Tory attack ads will hurt Mulcair and his party unless he clarifies issues, especially the nagging question why he never told any authority (the Speaker of the Legislature; the RCMP; the provincial police; the Premier; whoever …) about his concerns about ‘the envelope’.

Full Story »

 
Alberta

POP Montreal Unveils NxNE & Sled Island Dates

Posted May 15, 2013 by Andrew_Horan

POP Montreal has unveiled its showcases at NxNE in Toronto and Sled Island in Calgary. They will collaborate with NeXT for a showcase at The Silver Dollar on June 14. The event will feature hotly buzzed MTL band AroarA with the Toronto contingent being represented by Decades, Alvvays and more. Complete line-up is below; 8:00pm - AroarA [...]

Full Story »

 
Alberta

How one soldier’s death led to the unlikely friendship between an Alberta regiment and a Quebec high school

Posted May 14, 2013 by Christie Blatchford

The kids planting a tree for Sgt. Chris Karigiannis said ‘it can’t end there. They said we can’t care for him, but we can care for his friends. And that’s when everything changed’

Full Story »

 
General

The Belle Game Offer Free Stream Of Debut Album

Posted May 14, 2013 by Andrew_Horan

Vancouver quintet The Belle Game’s new album Ritual Tradition Habit is out today on Boompa Records and they’re offering a free stream of the release, check it out below; The band also unveiled the details of their summer tour, check ‘em out on the foll…

Full Story »

 
General

Martha Wainwright Announces Summer Tour

Posted May 14, 2013 by Andrew_Horan

Martha Wainwright has announced the dates of her Canadian tour in support of her 2012 album Come Home To Mama. This time out, Wainwright will partake in the Fan Experience; a VIP ticket package and ticket pre-sale provider that works with a wide variet…

Full Story »

 
General

Sean Nicholas Savage Releases Third Album On May 28

Posted May 3, 2013 by Andrew_Horan

Montreal singer Sean Nicholas Savage has announced that he will release his third album Other Life on May 28 via Arbutus Records. He’s offering a free stream of the track ‘More Than I Love Myself’, check it out here. The theme of Other Life is loss as …

Full Story »

 
Canada

The Canadian Progressive: Montreal Police Violated Protesters’ Rights During Student Protests, Says Report

Posted May 2, 2013 by Obert Madondo

By: Obert Madondo | The Canadian Progressive: The Montreal Police violated the rights of protesters during the 2012 student protests, says a new 47-page report based on 384 witness accounts. The report, called ”Testimonies of the Student Strike: Repression And Discrimination,” was compiled by ASSÉ, Quebec’s largest student federation, in association with the Quebec Human Rights [...]

The post Montreal Police Violated Protesters’ Rights During Student Protests, Says Report appeared first on The Canadian Progressive.

Full Story »

 
General

Que les firmes de génie coupables soient punies !

Posted May 1, 2013 by Claude Dupras

J’ai été ingénieur-conseil durant plus de 40 ans. J’ai vécu la naissance du génie au Québec, particulièrement celle des firmes francophones. Ma promotion de 1955, comptait 105 ingénieurs, la première fois que Polytechnique en produisait plus de 100.

Nous étions à peine quelques années avant la révolution tranquille qui viendra tout changer. De l’hydroélectricité, aux écoles secondaires et polyvalentes, aux cegeps, aux hôpitaux gouvernementaux, à la modernisation du système routier à la relocalisation d’une grande partie de la population dans la couronne métropolitaine, et encore, tout découlait de la révolution tranquille. D’un coup, le besoin de services d’ingénieurs conseils éclata. C’est ainsi que de cette promotion plus de 10 nouvelles firmes d’ingénieurs conseils prirent naissance, dont la mienne devenue Dupras Ledoux, Desjardins Sauriol (devenue Dessau), Gendron Lefebvre, etc..

Ma firme était spécialisée en mécanique et électricité de bâtiments, gérance de travaux et informatique avec un personnel variant de 50 à 100 individus. On qualifie aujourd’hui une telle firme de « petite firme ». Depuis 15 ans, j’ai l’ai quitté pour la retraite et mes autres occupations. Elle demeure toujours active.

Pour dénicher des contrats, nous devions nous faire connaître professionnellement pour obtenir des nominations, présenter multiples applications aux commissions scolaires, aux villes, au gouvernement, aux CA des hôpitaux, etc… avec le CV des employés de la firme et la liste de ses réalisations. Et malgré de petits budgets de relations publiques nous avons réussi, petit à petit, à obtenir des mandats de plus en plus importants, ici et là, dans les domaines privé et public.

La commission d’enquête Charbonneau sur la construction dévoile que des systèmes de collusion et de corruption inimaginables étaient en place dans le domaine public. Encore hier, un témoin dénommé Gilles Cloutier, qui se présente comme un organisateur hors pair pour élections municipales, est venu expliquer comment il a réussi à faire élire les maires et les conseillers municipaux de dizaines de villes et villages du Québec. Pour atteindre ses fins, il utilisait des méthodes irrespectueuses des lois électorales. Il a admis avoir été mandaté pour ce faire, à tour de rôle, par deux firmes d’ingénieurs-conseils : Dessau et Roche.

Cloutier offrait (il garantissait presque) aux aspirants-candidats à la mairie et au conseil des villes impliquées, de les faire élire en organisant leur campagne électorale avec la méthode clef-en-main (financement, organisation, publicité etc.) et cela gratuitement à la condition qu’ils s’engagent, une fois élus, d’accorder durant leur mandat, sans soumission ou autrement, tous les travaux municipaux nécessitant un travail de génie civil à la firme d’ingénieurs-conseils qui avait retenu ses services.

Non seulement, ces firmes nommées semblent avoir triché en œuvrant pour la ville de Montréal et avoir participé illégalement au financement des partis politiques du Québec dans le but d’obtenir des contrats publics, elles se sont abaissées, selon les dires de Cloutier, à devenir des fossoyeurs de la démocratie en mettant sur pied et en finançant des stratagèmes électoraux illégaux.

En aparté, Cloutier a fait des déclarations ayant rapport avec du financement illégal qu’il aurait collecté lors de la campagne référendaire de 1995 sur la séparation du Québec de l’ensemble canadien. On se rappellera quelle fut gagnée de justesse par le NON. Les souverainistes-indépendantistes-séparatistes accusent, depuis ce jour, le clan du NON de leur avoir volé le pays Québec. Ils rappellent la déclaration du premier ministre Parizeau, le soir du vote, qui blâma les « ethnies et l’argent » pour la défaite de son option et pour laquelle il a essuyé des reproches sévères. Les déclarations de Cloutier viennent confirmer en partie l’opinion de Parizeau et renforcent la hargne des séparatistes envers les fédéralistes, tout en allant à l’encontre de la bonne entente au Québec. Encore-là, il a rendu un mauvais service.

Les exemples précédant l’aparté, ajoutés à tous les autres donnés depuis le début de l’enquête, sont intolérables. À mon avis, toutes les firmes qui les ont générés et qui seront reconnues coupables par la loi, devront être punies. Que faire ?

Voici ma suggestion :

Premièrement, l’Ordre des Ingénieurs doit agir, enquêter et suspendre tous les ingénieurs qui de près ou de loin ont participé à ces illégalités. C’est une question de déontologie et de protection de la société.

Deuxièmement, ces firmes devraient perdre le droit de soumissionner pour une période de cinq ans sur tous les projets directs et indirects, financés par le gouvernement, où la collusion a été démontrée. Si une ou l’autre des firmes perd des mandats et se réveille avec du personnel en surplus, que ces ingénieurs spécialisés et compétents créent leur propre de « petites firmes » et obtiennent des mandats à leur compte.

La réalisation des plans et devis et la surveillance des travaux de 90 % des travaux publics peuvent être faits par les « petites firmes » spécialisées. C’est un mythe de penser que nous avons besoin au Québec de « grosses firmes » fourre-tout de 2 000 à 20 000 employés pour la réalisation des projets de construction publics. Ces firmes sont trop grosses, leur pouvoir n’a pas de limite et elles bousculent les petites firmes compétentes par leurs manèges et leur gros budget de développement des affaires.

Les « grosses firmes » pour les projets internationaux et certains très gros projets locaux, c’est bon, mais chez nous, il faut reconnaître davantage la valeur des « petites firmes » et bien les utiliser. Normalement, les clients sont très bien servis par ces dernières car leurs patrons s’impliquent personnellement dans la réalisation de leurs projets. Il est bon de rappeler ici, que dans le domaine privé, les grands projets sont souventes fois réalisés par les « petites firmes ».

Troisièmement, ces firmes devraient payer une amende égale au montant total des crédits d’impôt accordés par le gouvernement à tous les prête-noms qui ont participé à cette illégalité. En plus, chacun de ces prête-noms devrait rembourser personnellement aussi les crédits d’impôts dont il a bénéficié. Ainsi, le gouvernement recevra la presque totalité des montants versés et tous ceux qui ont participé à ce stratagème seront punis.
Par contre, les partis politiques qui ont reçu ces contributions ne devraient pas être obligés de les rembourser. Ils ne peuvent être blâmés par ce stratagème imaginé et mis en place par les firmes et les contributeurs. L’argent est dépensé et les sommes sont si mirobolantes qu’un remboursement nuirait à la solidité financière des partis politiques.

Quatrièmement, les firmes de génie ayant travaillé pour Montréal et faisant partie de la collusion du partage des contrats devraient rembourser 20% des honoraires supplémentaires qu’elles ont perçus sur les contrats exécutés pour la ville, puisque les coûts des travaux de la ville ont été augmentés, par tricherie des entrepreneurs, de 20% à 30% par rapport aux coûts normaux et qu’ils n’ont rien dit.

Cinquièmement, il serait sensé que tous les dirigeants actuels de ces firmes et les membres de leur conseil d’administration soient renvoyés pour une période de 5 ans et remplacés par des individus dont la compétence et la probité est reconnue.

Si on n’agit pas radicalement et vite, on verra dans quelques années la tête de l’hydre ressurgir.

Full Story »

 
 


The Latest