For all my Canadian readers (and any international readers planning to attend), here just a quick reminder that the deadline for early bird discount registration for the upcoming 4th Canadian Obesity Summit in Toronto, April 28 – May 2, ends March 3rd. To anyone who has been at a previous Canadian Summit, attending is certainly a “no-brainer” – for anyone, who hasn’t … Read More »
Published this month in the Journal of General Internal Medicine was a study that looked at the impact of an interventionist led program geared towards increasing physical activity in sedentary women with overweight and obesity.
The outcome of the intervention was in one sense quite significant – at 3 months the women randomly assigned to the interventionist led group reported performing nearly 4x as much exercise as the women randomly assigned to a self-directed intervention. Unfortunately though, by month 12, that difference shrank to the point of no longer being statistically significant.
Why did their exercise drop off so much?
Perhaps it was because of the fact that exercising more at 3 months didn’t result in any increase in weight loss for the interventionist led group, which, like it does with gym goers every New Year’s season, may have led those folks exercising more at month 3 to have long since given up exercising more by month 12 following the repeated frustration of scales that didn’t do what was hoped of them.
Overselling exercise’s benefits to weight while underselling its benefits to health, does a disservice to both.
In 2011, The Lancet dedicated a special issue to the topic of obesity – the general gist being that obesity is a world wide problem which will not be reversed without government leadership and will require a systems approach across multiple sectors. The Lancet also noted that current assumptions about the speed and sustainability of weight loss are wrong. This week, The Lancet again dedicate… Read More »
Jonathan Goodman is a fitness trainer turned social media and business development guru. I met Jonathan when he asked me to come and give a talk for one of his events and recently he reached out to ask if he might share a piece with the readers here.
The fitness landscape has become fragmented and polarizing. This is making for an elitist divide not just between the converted and the unconverted, but between different factions of the converted.
When people say, “I need to work my way up to the gym” it saddens me. Have we really created a fitness environment where people feel like they’re not ready to get into shape? The gym should be a sanctuary where all are welcome.
Physical activity has given me confidence and purpose. As a result, I’ve dedicated my life to improving the quality of fitness instruction. But there are a number of reasons why people aren’t comfortable in our gyms, and the first step is recognizing that there is a problem.
Cognitive dissonance and the emergence of filter bubbles
The seminal observational study of cognitive dissonance from 1956, When Prophecy Fails, starts by saying, “a man with conviction is a hard man to change. Tell him you disagree and he turns away. Show him facts or figures and he questions your sources. Appeal to logic and he fails to see your point.”
The parallel between the cult studied in When Prophecy Fails and many fitness cults that have emerged today is troubling. I’ll use “paleo” to illustrate my point because, while there’s nothing wrong with eating the way that many paleo pundits advise, the entire premise behind it is absurd.
The narrative is enticing – our ancestors ate a certain way and therefore we should eat a certain way. Unfortunately, the narrative has been proven to be untrue. One would think that if a concept is proven to be untrue then interest in it would dwindle, but, in this case, the opposite has happened. So why do people who identify themselves as “paleo” continue to become more numerous and their desire to spread a false narrative growing?
When Prophecy Fails provides some insight into the five conditions that lead to the observed “increased fervor following the disconfirmation of belief”. They are:
And don’t think that I’m picking on paleo. Many of the fitness cults like CrossFit and biohacking that exist today meet these conditions as well.
Cognitive dissonance refers to the differing of two beliefs that do not fit together. It results in discomfort, anxiety, and pain. The common response when faced with dissonance is to search for consonance to override the painful experience. One of the most common ways to do so is to look for social support, and this is where filter bubbles come into the picture.
The Filter Bubble
Eli Pariser is credited with popularizing the term “filter bubble” to describe the burgeoning personalized web. Every click, like, share, or comment that you make online is tracked and fed into a giant information bucket, sorted, and sold. The result is that your digital profile continues to evolve in the eyes of advertisers. Search has become reverse search. Google, Facebook, and thousands of other sites know who you are and what you like and show you information that is agreeable to you.
What it comes down to is this, “if you’re not the consumer than you are the product.”
Conspiracy theorists may be wearing tin hats, but I argue that the main problem is not that Big Brother is watching. The problem is that our ability to experience and think is being diminished with every passing day. Awareness is built upon associative connections, or reference points. There are no acquired emotions and feelings. How you make sense of information is in reference to something that you already know to exist.
Eli Pariser sums up the problem when he said,
“Just as the factory farming system that produces and delivers our food shapes what we eat, the dynamics of our media shape what information we consume. Now we’re quickly shifting toward a regiment chock-full of personally relevant information. And while that can be helpful, too much of a good thing can also cause real problems. Left to their own devices, personalization filters serve up a kind of invisible autopropaganda, indoctrinating us with our own ideas, amplifying our desire for things that are familiar and leaving us oblivious to the dangers lurking in the dark territory of the unknown.”
Whether you know it or not, you’ve been building a bubble around yourself. Increasingly dissonant information is being hidden from you and your resulting consonance is growing. These bubbles act to filter out any dissonant information before it arrives and, when it does arrive, ample support is already there to support pre-existing notions.
For society at large it means that factions exist. And these factions are just as exclusive as they are inclusive.
Why has the gym become elitist?
Now that I’ve briefly discussed the problem of arranging into groups, I’d like to cover some other topics that lead to an elitist fitness divide between the converted and unconverted.
1. Everyday boasting masked as motivation
Motivational sayings (often referred to as fitspo) superimposed over a half-naked photoshopped body have been around for years. What’s new is that sites like Facebook and Instagram have brought them into everybody’s homes. While these photos are nice to look at I’d argue they aren’t helping anybody. Instead they’re acting as a way for the already in-shape to show off.
While the person sharing the quote might be doing it under the guise of motivation, it’s not motivational to those who really need it. It’s a new method of boasting.
The most common reason why people share material on the Internet is a concept called selective self-representation. In essence, sharing is a way to show off or receive perceived social support on stuff that a person is unconfident about. Not only that, but people who rank lower on scales of emotional stability share more often. The motivational quote that is being shared isn’t altruistic. It’s being done because the sharer feels like it will make him or her appear a certain way to people who he or she wants to impress.
Think about it – who within your Facebook friend group shares motivational material? Is it the people who don’t exercise or really ripped workout nuts? One of the largest reasons that people share material on the Internet is to show off what they already do. Richard Dawkins, in the Selfish Gene, was the first to coin the term “meme” when he said,
“Just as genes propagate themselves in the gene pool by leaping from body to body via sperms or eggs, so memes propagate themselves in the meme pool by leaping from brain to brain, via a process which, in the broad sense, can be called imitation.”
When people think of memes they usually think of cat pictures and superimposed text on images of celebrities. I’d like to coin a new phrase: “the selfish meme”, as an evolution of Dawkins’ original idea because I don’t believe that altruism exists online. Memes are released with the creator’s best intentions in mind and they spread purposely through networks by people who have something to gain from passing them along whether we’re willing to admit it or not.
Large companies know this and are taking advantage of it.
Instead of spending lots of money on TV and print ads, smart companies are superimposing a motivational phrase on a picture of an attractive, and usually photoshopped, person. The result is that the picture spreads and the company gets free advertising. This behaviour is perpetuating an elitist gym environment and an unrealistic ideal.
People who don’t exercise aren’t stupid. They know they should be in the gym and already feel bad about not doing it. They don’t need a picture of a beautiful person with an oft-repeated slogan to remind them to “just do it”.
Dogma’s are created and broken every day. Conflicting information is common and everyone seems to be an expert that has stumbled upon the “next best thing”. Fact is there isn’t a next best thing. Exercise is beautiful in its simplicity. The next best thing may be slightly better or slightly worse than the last best thing. It does however confuse the hell out of anybody reading it.
Somebody new to the gym has no idea who or what to listen to. The reality is that if they picked one source and followed it they’d succeed. This is irrelevant of how profound the information is.
I get the need to continually innovate and am a proponent of the scientific method. However the nature of building a brand around one way of doing things forces the creator into the opposite of the scientific method – that is, if proven wrong, be willing to change. The minute that a business revolves around a singular idea it becomes near impossible for the purveyor of that idea to change if proven wrong. If you’ve built a business around the paleo narrative, for example, and the narrative is proven false, you have no choice but to cling to it. This is wrong.
Another issue is that it’s also a lot easier to sell the newest method of fat loss than it is to get somebody excited about the tried and tested method. The contrarian method of gaining exposure is also adding to the problem and its use is growing.
For somebody new to exercise, the task is daunting with the first steps being the hardest. Not knowing what program is “best” adds to the struggle. What bothers me is the “best” program probably isn’t even the best. Unless you’ve got at least a year of serious strength training under your belt, stop looking for “the best”. Choose a program and start today.
The problem compounds upon itself when conflicting theories are written as fact. Somebody who has never exercised before will benefit from steady-state cardio, as an example. It’s not as evil as it’s cracked up to be. It may not be the most efficient way to exercise but it’s stood as an entry point for a lot of people to get their bearings in the gym. Sit on a bike for a couple weeks until you feel comfortable. Then start throwing weights around.
Let’s break down the barriers
The problems are real and they’re growing. In order to reverse the trend I see three solutions.
The first solution is exceedingly simple. If you’re already comfortable in the gym, work to make it a more comfortable place for others. When you see somebody unfit that’s new in your club, smile and introduce yourself.
When the person is leaving try to find something pertaining to his or her workout to complement. Say that you’re looking forward to seeing him or her in the gym again. In the coming days and weeks attempt to introduce that person to others in your gym. If he or she becomes a member of the community odds are they your new friend won’t fall off the workout wagon again.
The next solution is to understand the power of social modelling.
Motivational posters don’t motivate people unless they’re already exercising. Self-efficacy (the belief that one can achieve) is at its highest when the person feels that the model is the same as them. For it to be effective the demographic, background, injuries etc. must all be taken into consideration.
If you really want to motivate others in an altruistic sense you’d be passing around success stories of all types of people from all different backgrounds. I’m not talking about passing around sensationalistic stories about massive weight losses. I’m talking about real people, real struggles, and real successes.
The last solution is to leave your insular community stop confusing people.
Recognize that you’ve created a filter bubble around yourself. If you ascribe to one particular way of exercising or eating that fine, but it’s not for everybody. What you see in your searches and feeds was chosen for you because of actions that you’ve previously taken. I urge you not only to read opposing opinions, but also to introduce others to them.
The fitness world is becoming elitist. The fit have created a daunting atmosphere where the unfit don’t feel welcome. Filter bubbles reinforce our preconceived notions, reinforce our consonance and downplay any cognitive dissonance, and provide us ample support from others for ideas that might have already been proven wrong.
Think before you share a sweaty photoshopped image about whom you’re really trying to motivate and what you’re really getting out of it. Consider the “next best thing” that you’re peppering your friends, family members, or blog readers with and think hard about the effect it’s really having.
Jonathan Goodman is the author of Ignite the Fire, a book that teaches how to become a personal trainer and build a successful career. To learn more about his personal training books and free collaborative resource for trainers, go to the Personal Trainer Development Center.
It would seem to me that the only rationale for the posting of gym based calorie burns would be for weight management.
Sure, some folks may well use them to maximize the calories they burn through exercise, but I can’t help but wonder whether others will use them as a rationale for eating back their exercise? I also have real doubts about some of the numbers listed – to my eyes they seem rather inflated which in turn might present someone concerned with calories a false sense of security.
Seems to me this would be an area ripe for study.
Does posting this information help people with weight management, or paradoxically might it make it more difficult?